 |
Group 12 |
 |
 |
2009-2010 |
 |
| Home |
Biographies |
Overview |
Deliverables |
Updates |
Presentations |
| Introduction |
The breath condensation device will be utilized
by patients with various pulmonary diseases, such as asthma, emphysema, and
chronic bronchitis. The device will be
designed for use in doctors’ offices and in the patient’s home. The current collection process for breath
condensation is complicated and requires several steps. A complex network of cooling tubes, a cooling
machine, and a refrigeration circuit comprise the current device. Once the condensate is collected it must be
removed and analyzed using external methods such as electrochemistry and
spectroscopy. |
| Problem Statement |
Numerous chemicals are present in the condensate
of exhaled breath. If the condensate is
collected, the chemicals contained within the fluid can be analyzed, providing
valuable insight on the condition of metabolic and disease activity in a
patient’s lungs. Current breath
condensate collection methods are considered problematic due to the fact that
large samples of condensate are required to obtain an accurate analysis. In addition, current EBC (external breath
condensate) collection devices take more than fifteen minutes to collect an
ample amount of condensate. |
| Objective |
Construct a handheld breath condensation device
that is efficient and accurate enough to give a reading in less than fifteen
minutes. The device must collect EBC for
external analysis to determine if his/her body has responded with inflammation
due to personal habits and/or his/her respective pulmonary disease. The ultimate goal is to produce a product that
is cost effective and user friendly enough that it can be utilized in a
doctor’s office or a patient’s home. |
| Constraints |
The breath condensation device needs to be small
enough that a child can hold it while it is in use. This will be accomplished by separating the
housing unit and mouthpiece. Therefore,
the patient will only be required to hold the mouthpiece, which will channel
their expired breath into the housing for condensation. Additionally, the device will be made in such
a way that certain parts can be cleaned and/or replaced after each use. The device must also be efficient enough to
collect an accurate sample in less than fifteen minutes of use. Next, the device should allow, not inhibit
normal breathing while being utilized. Finally, the device should be cost effective enough to be used in a
doctor’s office. Due to monetary
constraints set forth by the $1,500 budget, real-time feedback sensors will not
be included in the final design. |
|
|